RTH Fibonacci
Fibonacci retracements have a reputation problem, and largely a deserved one. Drawn arbitrarily between any two points a trader likes, they produce levels that appear to work because there are enough of them that something is always nearby.
The anchoring is what separates a usable framework from confirmation bias. RTH Fibonacci is a specific answer to the question of what to anchor to.
RTH versus the full session
Index futures trade nearly around the clock. RTH — regular trading hours — refers to the US cash equity session, 9:30 to 16:00 ET, when the underlying index constituents are actually trading.
The remainder, the overnight Globex session, is a genuinely different market: thinner, driven by European flow and news, with participants who are frequently not the ones who will set price during the US day.
Anchoring Fibonacci to the RTH range specifically means the levels describe the session where the majority of institutional US equity flow occurs. That is a defensible reason to choose those two anchor points — which is more than can be said for most Fibonacci drawing.
Why anchoring is the entire argument
There is no evidence that 61.8% has mystical significance in financial markets. What there is: a large number of participants watching the same levels derived from the same well-defined range.
That makes RTH Fibonacci a coordination mechanism rather than a natural law. The levels matter to the degree that a meaningful number of participants are computing them the same way from the same anchors.
This is why the anchoring convention matters far more than the ratios. A level everyone derives identically has some claim to relevance. A level you derived from a swing you personally liked the look of has none.
Where it works and where it fails
Reasonable conditions
Rotational sessions where the market is working within an established range. The retracement levels describe meaningful fractions of a range participants agree exists.
Poor conditions
Trend days and gap opens. When the market is repricing rather than rotating, retracement levels from a prior range describe an auction that is no longer running. Price passes through them without acknowledgement, which is the correct behaviour, not a failure of the tool.
Knowing which kind of day you are in before you rely on the levels is the part that determines whether this helps or hurts. That is a market structure judgment, not a Fibonacci one — another reason the course sequences structure before this module.
Fibonacci is not a system
Worth stating directly. RTH Fibonacci produces reference levels — places where a reaction is more likely than at an arbitrary price. It does not tell you:
- Which direction to trade
- Whether a level will hold or break
- Where to place a stop
- What size to take
A level is a place to pay attention, not a reason to enter. What confirms or rejects the reaction is order flow and structure — which is why this module sits between them in the course rather than standing alone.
How this is taught in the room
Above is the framework: why RTH, why anchoring matters more than the ratios, and the conditions under which the whole approach stops working. What members get is the applied version — which RTH levels we actually plot and which we discard, how we combine them with prior-session value, what confirms a reaction at a level versus a level simply being touched, and how we handle the open on days the framework does not apply.
These levels are on the chart before the open every day and worked through live in the New York session.
Platform
Charted on TradingView, anchored to the RTH session rather than the full Globex range. The course covers the session settings, which are easy to get subtly wrong and produce levels that look right and are not.
See it run live.
We work through this in the London and New York sessions every day. Seven days free, then $199/month.
Start your 7-day trial Join the free Discord